Violence and aggression actually unfold when we talk of a relationship sport that is playing around the world. Examples of bouncing and demoralizing hits in football, basketball and football elbows, as well as hitting the ice hockey to get the puck. There is a lot of violence and violence in the sport, and as the danger grows, at all levels the player's security and well-being are at risk. According to Mike Smith, a respected Canadian sports sociologist has come to the conclusion that four categories identify sports violence.
The first level of violence is brutal body contact, which involves frequent physical exercises in some sports, such as leg balls and football. every athlete accepts as part of the sport. Examples can be in football and football, and body tests in hockey. These hits have great power and sometimes have consequences, but this is what these athletes are paying for and of course they are waiting for. The second level of violence is cross-border violence, which includes practices that violate the rules of the game, but accepted by most players, as these are part of the competition strategies; It is also called "mind game". Examples of this can be the brush in baseball, the fist fight in the hockey, and the little elbow or bullet while playing so that the opponent is afraid to incorporate the fear level in them. The third level of violence is quasi-criminal violence, which involves practices that violate official rules of the game and may lead to suspension, as this is contrary to the sport's norm. Examples include cheap recordings, late hits, percussive punches, and improper offenses that potentially threaten the athlete. The ultimate level of violence is committing the offense, which involves outlawing practices in order to challenge athletes.
Examples of these attacks during the game are likely to cause serious injury to another player as a hockey player as a weapon or as a bass player who deliberately thrown the ball, especially in the head and neck. These four reasons are very interesting, as athletes and analysts break down the violence in sport to explain some of the incidents that may occur. Before I saw violence as a thing that would harm a person, even if it was not intentional, but these four reasons help people, especially sports-like athletes, to understand the severity of some violence and how to accept it in the sport world.
There are factors and characteristics in the crowd that sport violence, hostility and hostility regardless of sport. There are nine known characteristics that lead to this level of "hate" while observing and experiencing the game:
1. Mass and viewer standing or sitting systems.
2. Composition of the crowd in terms of age, sex, social class and racial / ethnic mix.
3. The importance and meaning of the event for viewers.
4. The History of Relationship between Teams and Viewers.
5. Mass control strategies used by the event (police, offensive dogs, surveillance cameras or other security measures).
6. Alcohol consumption by viewers.
7. Location of the event (one of the opponents' neutral pages or website).
8. Reasons for viewers to attend the event and what they want to do at the event.
Some of these factors are easy to think for reasons but the other factors included in the list are new.
9. The significance of the team is the source of the identity of viewers (lass identity, ethnic or national identity, regional or local identity, club or band identity) were for me and helped open up more knowledge. They get acquainted with viewers' thoughts and actions, and why there are some who do stupid things on the basis of their many effects on the sport.
After researching and reading on the violence of sport, my observations or my delusions did not really change; the findings actually reinforced my thoughts and beliefs on this topic and I put it in stone that I think and what analysts and professionals also believe. I thought it was permissible for a certain violence, and it was considered that this "norm" in sports, while other violence crossed the invisible line that athletes would never do. Four parts of violence and how did the Canadian sociologist really helped me to reassure my sport-related violent ideas and convictions and helped to prove the facts that many people are interested in. The use of violence as intimidation in non-contact sports can also have a significant impact on some athletes. Examples like tennis players who trap them mocking the tennis ball, shouting at the umpire, to show the side of violence through words and actions to frighten their opponents without being physically in contact with them. Athletes use words, thoughts of violence to encourage leadership in the need to be the best in sports, regardless of their lack of contact or contact. They want to be the best and not let anything go to their dreams and create a barrier.
Source by sbobet